They fuck souls in Japan
Forgive the profanity! my throat's killing me. it's no longer hard to pretend to be sick if you are really one.
so far, i haven't done anything decent regarding my main short term goal, that is about my Masters thesis for UP. to make matters worse, when i analyzed for updates my infamous "10 things that I would like to accomplish in before I leave Japan", I come to realize the virtual "NP-hardness" of performing those tasks. I've written them down:
Update on the 10 things I want to accomplish before I leave Japan
(in no particular order)
1. Get a US Visa. At least 1 year Multiple – Earliest: April 2006 year when I get extension of my scholarship. Plus about 20万。
2. Achieve 2 Kyo Japanese Proficiency Level – Earliest: 2008. Right now, I might even fail 4 居。
3. Finish my MS Mathematics degree in UP, thesis option – Earliest: August 2005. This year or never. Most feasible if only someone would cooperate.
4. Skii Level 4 - Suicide hill in Nagano – Earliest: December 2006. We have to wait for the next, next winter since I’m just starting to fare out well on beginner’s level.
5. Climb the top of Mt. Fuji at least twice – Earliest: July 2007. This year doesn’t promise even 1 full climb, and schedule might conflict on Goal #3.
6. Travel to Okinawa and perform the sand-bottle-romance legend –Travel within Japan means a lot of cash and Goal 1’s should be prioritize not because of importance but of mere chronology.
7. Finish the novel I’ve been writing for 3 years – I’m an artist so I can’t possibly force myself on this. Although, I can manage to squeeze this if only I can purchase a new dvd drive for my notebook.
8. Have a serious relationship with my sweetie – Latest: February 2006, after then he might move to a new apartment or worse return to the Philippines. Better act fast and strive harder than before.
9. Conceive our kid – This is only one night, I wonder why it’s NP-hard to occur. Again, watch out for the biological clock.
10. Get married – Hmmm, Accomplish #9 and by some luck this goal comes like a toy in a happy meal. But for the sake of nobility, I won’t resort to that yet. The prime number challenge is still on and 23 is my figure to beat!!
Streaming thoughts: I've read a forwarded e-mail about a former UP Math Prof named Edgar Escultura, and the internet- hype about his refutation of Andrew Wiles' proof of FLT. More importantly, he disproves even the most fundamental concepts in Mathematics like the Trichotomy Axiom and Axiom of Completeness. I understand the waves of controversy it created and it doesn't surprise me that my friends from the Philippines are relentlessly forwarding such mails to colleagues.
Well, on the surface I admit that I felt proud to be a Filipino. But as an amateur Mathematician who used to have so much flair for Mathematics (before I came to Japan and become fucked up), I doubt whether to even consider such news as earth-shaking, whether if he's correct or not.
I mean, suppose you are playing some kind of a sport, without lost of generality let's say that it's basketball. We know that rules of the game have evolve through time. Suppose that some curious player and high-leaper named FFclaimed that it is impossible to dunk from the 3-pt. line. Of course, a lot of other players have tried to dispute FF and tried their luck in dunking (Jordan, Vince Carter, etc...) but failed. It seems impossible because nobody can show a dunk from the 3-pt line but nobody can say that FF is correct because some other super player might be able to dunk in the future.
And then came wonder boy Andrew who studied intensively on biometrics and other hard stuffs. No, he did not attempt to dunk from the 3-pt line but instead showed that it's impossible because of blah, blah, complicated physiology, physics, blah, blah. Only intelligent players understood him but he's proclaimed to be correct, anyway.
But
from out of nowhere, an Edgar from some obscure 3rd world country, who
wants to do a Nash (I'm referring to my Steve, not schizophrenic John For
me, I daresay not. At least, not necessarily. Even if Andrew would
concede so. Because, Andrew played using the 'rules' of the game, while
Edgar tingled with the 'rules' and by doing so, found faults on
Andrew's work. I
would vote to stay with the 'known' rules even if it's not so perfect,
cause afterall we've been playing and enjoying the 'game' for centuries
and we've managed to lived arduously with that. -mG
)
made controversial statements about the invalidity of the rules of the
game and in particular something about the 3-pt line. If he's correct
then necessarily Andrew must be wrong.
and I have nothing against Prof./Dr. Edgar Escultura, to rightfully give him back his title.
Currently listening to: Saving All My Love For You by Whitney Houston
Currently reading: Algebraic Number Theory by A. Frolich, M.J. Taylor
Currently feeling: nauseated
Posted by shizukuxp at 06:12 PM in Musings of a venerable.. as a favorite post | 1 Stalked bk

ω
)


